Question no 25: What are some advantages of using Howard Nicholls' cyclical model in curriculum development?
Answer: Advantages include the provision of crucial context through situational analysis, the emphasis on interdependent curriculum elements, which leads to a holistic curriculum, and the flexibility to adapt and revise the curriculum as needed.
Question no 26: What are the potential disadvantages associated with Howard Nicholls' model?
Answer: Disadvantages include the potential for a time-consuming process, especially due to the comprehensive nature of situational analysis and ongoing revisions. Conducting situational analysis can also be challenging, particularly in complex educational settings. Excessive flexibility may lead to difficulties in maintaining consistency and structure in the curriculum.
Question no 27: How does Howard Nicholls' model compare to other curriculum development models like Tyler, Taba, and Wheeler?
Answer: Howard Nicholls' model draws inspiration from Tyler, Taba, and Wheeler but adds the crucial step of situational analysis to ensure curriculum responsiveness to the specific environment. It's cyclical, emphasizing continuous evaluation and adaptation, and it recognizes the interdependence of curriculum components.
Question no 28: What is the central idea behind dynamic models of curriculum development, and how do they differ from linear, prescriptive models?
Answer: Dynamic models emphasize that curriculum development is a dynamic and interactive process, starting from any curriculum element, rather than following a linear and prescriptive sequence of steps. They focus on the behavior and interactions of educators in creating curricula.
Question no 29: Can you describe the three phases of Decker Walker's dynamic model of curriculum development?
Answer: Decker Walker's model comprises three phases: the Platform Phase, the Deliberation Phase, and the Design Phase. Platform statements are recognized in the first phase, complex discussions occur in the second, and decisions about curriculum components are made in the third.
Question no 30: How does Malcolm Skilbeck's dynamic model differ from traditional, rational curriculum development models?
Answer: Skilbeck's dynamic model doesn't follow a fixed sequence of steps. It begins with situational analysis, considers goals formed collaboratively by teachers and learners, and places teachers at the center of the evaluation phase. It's more flexible and responsive to real-world educational contexts.
