Question no 43: How did the Hunter commission propose to handle the training of primary school teachers?
Answer: The commission recommended establishing normal schools for primary school teacher training, with provincial funds covering the associated costs
Question no 44: What impact did the recommendations of the Hunter Education Commission have on the educational policies of the time?
Answer: The recommendations had a substantial impact, influencing the development of primary and secondary education policies and institutions in India.
Question no 45: What prompted Lord Curzon to establish the University Commission in 1902?
Answer: Lord Curzon established the University Commission in 1902 in response to concerns raised during an educational conference in Shimla in 1901, reflecting his interest in addressing issues from primary to university education levels.
Question no 46: What were the primary objectives of the University Commission established by Lord Curzon?
Answer: The commission aimed to investigate the conditions and future prospects of universities in British India, assess proposals for enhancing their structure and functionality, and recommend measures to improve the quality of university teaching.
Question no 47: What key recommendations did the University Commission propose for improving university administration and education?
Answer: The commission recommended the reorganization of administrative structures, systematic oversight of affiliated colleges, imposition of clearer conditions for college affiliation, and significant changes in curricula and examination methods.
Question no 48: What was a notable drawback of both the Shimla Conference and the University Commission in terms of representation?
Answer: Neither the Shimla Conference nor the University Commission included Indian representatives, causing dissatisfaction and hurting the sentiments of the Indian population.
